Skip to content

Remove visible path calculation from allowed deprecation lint #89395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

In-line
Copy link
Contributor

@In-line In-line commented Sep 30, 2021

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 30, 2021
@In-line
Copy link
Contributor Author

In-line commented Sep 30, 2021

Please kindly do a perf run

@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 30, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

⌛ Trying commit d98ac57 with merge d9adfdc04c6c9666a80f3c6a09cd3a40cabc2b44...

@In-line
Copy link
Contributor Author

In-line commented Sep 30, 2021

Related #87349 #89120

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: d9adfdc04c6c9666a80f3c6a09cd3a40cabc2b44 (d9adfdc04c6c9666a80f3c6a09cd3a40cabc2b44)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued d9adfdc04c6c9666a80f3c6a09cd3a40cabc2b44 with parent 69c1c6a, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d9adfdc04c6c9666a80f3c6a09cd3a40cabc2b44): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to very large relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.

  • Very large improvement in instruction counts (up to -10.9% on incr-patched: minor change builds of tokio-webpush-simple)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 30, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 added A-lints Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut. I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 30, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Sep 30, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

📌 Commit d98ac57 has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 30, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

⌛ Testing commit d98ac57 with merge 7d69c5859dc31a6dc94cf852628f4b2c5af92dd2...

@jyn514 jyn514 added the relnotes-perf Performance improvements that should be mentioned in the release notes. label Sep 30, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 30, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Sep 30, 2021

Timed out on apple without logs.

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 30, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 1, 2021

⌛ Testing commit d98ac57 with merge 4e4942d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 1, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jyn514
Pushing 4e4942d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 1, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 4e4942d into rust-lang:master Oct 1, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 1, 2021
@In-line In-line deleted the remove_visible_path_from_allowed_deprecated_lint branch October 1, 2021 09:04
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4e4942d): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to very large relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.

  • Very large improvement in instruction counts (up to -10.9% on incr-patched: minor change builds of tokio-webpush-simple)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-lints Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut. I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. relnotes-perf Performance improvements that should be mentioned in the release notes. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants